Maladaptive Daydreaming: where wild minds come to rest
Comment
Amity, for any kind of science you need knowledge and experience. And I'm personally arguing not about MDD origins but about Ram's misinterpretation of the terms disorder and addictoon. As for the rest, I agree with you, science can't be based on opinions, especially on too radical and too emotional ones.
Ram, your words still don't make any difference between addiction and disorder to me. I only see that you don't like the word disorder, becoz the word makes you sad. A behavioral addiction is a disorder btw.
"Behavioral addictions, which are sometimes referred to as impulse control disorders, are increasingly recognized as treatable forms of addiction." (c)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_addiction
I know many mindfull people that call it a disorder. I don't know what it should be named . I think both theories are plausible here, and if I would have any saying in it I would vote addiction too.
But saying only smart people call it an addiction, suggesting the rest of us here are stupid and wrong for calling it a disorder, I have a problem with that. Have some respect for 'the people roaming the sites' here. They're also people and they're not any dumber than you and they can form their own thoughts and conclusions with whatever science and opinions they can find.
I can understand that being hard on yourself because of your addiction, can be a good tactic for you to fight it or end it. But don't preach to others like that. People that call it a disorder call it that just because it's the name it has been given from the start, or because they think it realy is (or might be) an actual disorder. They are not naming it that just to have an excuse to stop trying to improve theirselves. They are trying to stop it just as much as you are.
The trueth is none of us knows what it is yet. We should wait for science to make some more moves, like Amity is dreaming said. Eli Somer has been doing some good research already. I'm hoping others will start researching this problem we have too soon. And guided by multiple studies we might one day give it a name that is without a doubt the right one. But untill than it's useless to be snob about whatever you choose to call it. We came here to solve our problems, or at the very least talk about it. We did not come here to start arguing over the name of our problems. That would just be silly.
"I don't think we need to jump to conclusions if this is a disorder or not. There is/soon going to be a study finding out if it is a disorder. If their findings realize it is or isn't a disorder, so be it. We can argue about this for hours, but we should just let science figure this out instead."
Yes, really, why even bother to think? I saw you were kinda encouraging people to conduct their own research. I don't argue with either of your two opinions, they just sound very contradictory. Can you explain how you combine them?
"But what if television is switched on in head
and remote is not present."
Then it's a disorder.
© 2024 Created by Valeria Franco. Powered by
You need to be a member of Wild Minds network to add comments!
Join Wild Minds network